Rapid Prototyping, Motor Assembly, and Print Optimization

Written by Railan Oviedo (Manufacturing)


For this semester’s version of Pete-Bot, the rapid prototyping process involved the verification of being able to fit the motors and the 3DoT board inside a single 3D-printed chassis piece. Furthermore, after confirming that the base design was suitable for fitting the motors and the 3DoT board, the model itself would be altered in order to reduce print time. For information on the print time for each version, see the Print Time post.

Printed Version 1

Shown are side-by-side views of the first version (Model vs. Printed Model). The chassis was printed through the use of Northrop Grumman’s 3D-printer thanks to the connections of a fellow student.

Figure One – Front View Side-by-Side

Figure Two – Back View Side-by-Side

Figure Three – Side View Side-by-Side

Testing 3DoT Board Placement

The mechanism for placing the board in this version is the flap in the back side, which can be pulled to allow for the board to be pushed into the chassis. This was tested and confirmed to work; however, the flimsy nature of the flap caused it to break off of the model, which is why it cannot be seen in the pictures. As such, it was decided that a new mechanism will have to implemented for follow-up versions.

Testing Motor Placement

After attempting to fit the motors inside the chassis, it was found that they could not directly be placed inside with the current design. The 3D-model pictures were altered after printing the chassis, so they show the possible solution to allowing the motors to be placed inside.

Printed Version 2

The second version’s design is as follows. This was printed at the same Northrop Grumman source, but the printer experienced a malfunction mid-print so the chassis came out in a much less stable state than originally anticipated. All versions after this were printed through Ridwan.

Figure Four – Front View Side-by-Side

Figure Five – Back View Side-by-Side

Figure Six – Side View Side-by-Side

Updates from Version 1

  • Pathway on the side has been made to allow the motors to be inserted into the chassis
  • Flap design has been altered so that there are now two small flaps that bend in the same direction of the printed layers
  • Holes were added to the bottom part of the front in order to allow the push-pins to have a place to be inserted. These push-pins will secure the paper shell to the chassis
  • Removed the two tiny holes in the front, as they were deemed to serve no purpose

Testing 3DoT Board Placement

This version still incorporates flaps of a sort, but the orientation has been switched. Instead, they bend towards the same direction of the printed layers, thus allowing for a stronger resistance to breaking. The board was once again confirmed to fit inside, but the flimsiness of the flaps were still notable, so further changes were made for future versions.

Testing Motor Placement

Despite the deformation of the design during the printing process, it was confirmed that adding the pathway between the holes allowed for both motors to be successfully inserted at the same time. From this version onwards, this part of the design remains the same since it properly performs its purpose and simultaneously leads to a lower print time.

Printed Version 3

As follows is the third design.

Figure Seven – Front View Side-by-Side

Figure Eight – Back View Side-by-Side

Figure Nine – Side View Side-by-Side

Updates from Version 2

  • Flaps were completely removed, in favor of making one section of the bottom somewhat separated from the rest of the chassis

Testing 3DoT Board Placement

After replacing the flaps with a small section of the chassis that can be pulled outward, it was found that this design is also sufficient in getting the 3Dot board placed inside. Furthermore, since no part of the chassis acts as a flap, the overall structure and security of the board in the chassis has increased. From all versions after this, the design for the 3DoT Board Placement will remain relatively the same.

Printed Version 4

The fourth design is as follows:

Figure Ten – Front View Side-by-Side

Figure Eleven – Back View Side-by-Side

Figure Twelve – Side View Side-by-Side

Updates from Version 3

  • Structures have been put in place on the inside of the chassis to allow for stable screw placement for the gear system
  • Holes on the side of the chassis have been repositioned for gear testing

Testing 3DoT Board Placement

During this iteration of the chassis, it was discovered that the micro-USB port and the power switch attached to a fully aseembled 3DoT board were unable to fit within the previous design. As such, larger holes were placed in the front to allow these parts of the board to fit inside. However, after testing, it was found that these changes were not enough, so revisions to the front will be made for future versions.

Printed Version 5

This version – being the most recent – is photographed with the motors and unassembled 3DoT board in place.

Figure Thirteen – Front View Side-by-Side

Figure Fourteen – Back View Side-by-Side

Figure Fifteen – Side View Side-by-Side

Figure Sixteen – Bottom View showing the unassembled 3DoT in place

Updates from Version 4

  • Because push-pins will only be inserted on the bak of the chassis, the front circular holes have been replaced with rectangular ones in order to accomodate a wooden platform that the castor wheel and color shield will attach to
  • The holes on the front have been expanded to allow for both the micro-USB port and the power switch to be inserted without hindrance

Testing 3DoT Board Placement

Despite the changes made to the front, it was found that the holes need to be even wider so that the fully assembled 3DoT can be placed inside. Besides this, no other design changes seem to be necessary.

Summary Table

Table One – Table Showcasing Current Status

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *